[Domestic Policy] RKI Files and Corona - Vaccination Certificate we're supposed to record long-term Side Effects

On March 20, 2024 the protocols of the German government's crisis team were published by the website Multipolar. The published protocols cover the period from January 2020 to April 2021. The release of these protocols had to be ordered by a court. Apart from the fact that the protocols were not released voluntarily they had previously been redacted. Even in this state the documents show the dishonest and manipulative approach of the government and the Robert Koch Institute (RKI).

In order to be able to enforce the contact restrictions that had been decided upon a vaccination certificate and an associated mobile phone app were introduced. Due to the contact restrictions the vaccination certificate had to be shown to enter certain public spaces. The vaccination certificate in turn could be applied for after vaccination or recovery. However the protocols show that these contact restrictions were politically and not scientifically based. [2] [3]

Hohe Dunkelziffer, es ist fachlich nicht begründbar und nicht sinnvoll, ein „opportunity sample“ (die Getesteten, die eine Infektion nachweisen können) mit Privilegien denen gegenüber, die es nicht oder nicht mehr (abhängig von AK-Test und Zeitspanne, die vergangen ist) nachweisen können.

High number of unreported cases it is not technically justifiable and does not make sense to have an "opportunity sample" (those tested who can prove an infection) with privileges over those who cannot or can no longer prove it (depending on the antibody test and the amount of time that has passed). [1, 414 Ergebnisprotokoll 05.03.2021, P.7]

The vaccination certificate that was introduced was in fact a necessity for many people and many things. This created the conditions for widespread distribution. But the protocols show that the vaccination certificate is intended to enable the recording of vaccination effects and long-term side effects.

- Das Impfzertifikat soll die Erfassung von Impfwirkung, Spätfolgen etc. ermöglichen, nicht Grundlage für Kategorien und Vorrechte sein.
- WHO befürwortet die Zertifikate nicht: Lack of data, keine Fälschungssicherheit, ethische Gründe (Diskriminierung).

- The vaccination certificate should enable the recording of vaccination effects, long-term side effects, etc., and should not be the basis for categories and privileges.
- WHO does not support the certificates: lack of data, no protection against forgery, ethical reasons (discrimination). [1, Ergebnisprotokoll 05.03.2021, P.7]

This is dishonest because this was kept secret. In addition there were officially no side effects.

Src:
[1] RKI Files
https://my.hidrive.com/share/2-hpbu3.3u
[2] Digitales COVID-Zertifikat der EU
https://www.bundesgesundheitsministerium.de/coronavirus/covpass
[3] Zertifikat über Corona-Impfung - So funktioniert der digitale Impfpass 2021-08-07
https://www.tagesschau.de/inland/gesellschaft/digitaler-impfpass-107.html