[Domestic Policy] RKI Files and Corona - The measures were politically and not scientifically based 2024-07-24
On March 20, 2024 the protocols of the German government's crisis team were published by the website Multipolar. The published protocols cover the period from January 2020 to April 2021. The release of these protocols had to be ordered by a court. Apart from the fact that the protocols were not released voluntarily they had previously been redacted. Even in this state the documents show the dishonest and manipulative approach of the government and the Robert Koch Institute (RKI).
The crisis team should support the federal government in making decisions. And the federal government should take measures to protect the population. For this contact and access restrictions for certain spaces were introduced.
Certain public spaces and means of transport were only allowed to be entered by people who had been proven to be vaccinated, had recovered or tested negative. Anyone who could not show a vaccination, evidence of recovery or a negative test was not allowed to enter. However the protocols show that the escalation of the risk assessment was changed without any corresponding influencing factors.
Es soll diese Woche hochskaliert werden. Die Risikobewertung wird veröffentlicht, sobald [geschwärzt] ein Signal dafür gibt.
It is scheduled to be scaled up this week. The risk assessment will be published as soon as [redacted] gives a signal for it. [1, 80 Ergebnisprotokoll 16.03.2020, P.6]
This assessment of the situation is also not credible because the number of cases remained unchanged in real terms during the corresponding period. Although the number of positive test results has increased this was due to a corresponding increase or upscaling of the total number of tests. Measured against the total number of tests the positive results remained almost constant at 5.9% and 6.8%. [2, P.6]
A year later the protocols also discussed the lack of benefit of these measures.
Hohe Dunkelziffer, es ist fachlich nicht begründbar und nicht sinnvoll, ein „opportunity sample“ (die Getesteten, die eine Infektion nachweisen können) mit Privilegien denen gegenüber, die es nicht oder nicht mehr (abhängig von AK-Test und Zeitspanne, die vergangen ist) nachweisen können.
High number of unreported cases it is not technically justifiable and does not make sense to have an "opportunity sample" (those tested who can prove an infection) with privileges over those who cannot or can no longer prove it (depending on the antibody test and the amount of time that has passed). [1, 414 Ergebnisprotokoll 05.03.2021, P.7]
The measures to restrict contact and access appeared to be politically based rather than scientifically based. Furthermore the type and quality of these measures were similar worldwide. It can therefore be assumed that there was an overarching leadership above the governments of the states.
Src:[1] RKI Files
https://my.hidrive.com/share/2-hpbu3.3u
[2] Täglicher Lagebericht des RKI zur Coronavirus-Krankheit-2019 (COVID-19) 26.03.2020
https://www.rki.de/DE/Content/InfAZ/N/Neuartiges_Coronavirus/Situationsberichte/2020-03-26-de.pdf?__blob=publicationFile
Kommentare
Kommentar veröffentlichen