In the debate over whether Jihadists captured on the ground should be withdrawn there are many allegations.
Sometimes the societies of the European states are allegedly to blame, because the are supposedly discriminatory or systematically xenophobic.
Or the local jihadists did not know what they were getting themselves into when they left.
The allegation of discrimination will explain or even excuse the radicalization. If done this is always the claim to be the victim. However this allegation is difficult to uphold. Individual cases of discrimination may occur, but the current law prohibits such discrimination. On the other hand, a bizarre contest for tolerance occurs by providing separate swimming pools times or baning pork from canteens, and allowing questionable clubs such as DITIB or Milli Görüs. [1]
Another accusation is that discrimination within empoyment or unemployment is causing radicalization. This accusation is particularly absurd in the current state of the European Union. According to this argument, large parts of the population in Spain, Italy and Greece would have become terrorists as a result of high unemployment and very high youth unemployment. But they are not. On the other hand, this does not explain the success of Vietnamese in Germany. As a result of the Vietnam War Germany has acceptet various people who came from a completely foreign culture and were also war refugees. Nevertheless Vietnamese are on average very successful in Germany. [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7]
A particularly perfidious excuse is that the affected people have learned only locally that the IS commits crimes or that the other members of the IS are not real Muslims. With regards to the news coverage it is absurd to believe that the affected people did not know that the IS commits crimes, did not realize it until the end of the war or have remorses only now. Claiming that IS are not real Muslims is just a distraction with a new definition. It is nothing more than a no true Scotsman fallacy to disguise any common ground and responsibility for the underlying ideology.
But a different treatment in Europe that pushes for a radicalization still takes place. What is supplied that grows. And if a misconduct such as joining a terrorist group at worst remains without sanctions, then only such behavior can be expected in the future.
[1] Grundgesetz für die Bundesrepublik Deutschland Art 3
https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/gg/art_3.html
[2] Integration - Das vietnamesische Wunder 2009-01-22
https://www.zeit.de/2009/05/B-Vietnamesen/komplettansicht
[3] Vietnamesen in Deutschland - Unauffällig an die Spitze 2010-01-22
http://www.taz.de/!5149000/
[4] Vietnamesen in Deutschland - "Ich wollte immer auf die Uni" 2010-04-01
https://www.sueddeutsche.de/politik/vietnamesen-in-deutschland-nur-bildung-fuehrt-weg-vom-reisfeld-1.20543-2
[5] Integration: Der Fleiß und sein Preis 2010-09-09
https://www.zeit.de/2010/37/Integration-Vietnamesen/komplettansicht
[6] Ehrgeizige Vietnamesen - Streben für die Familienehre 2010-12-06
http://www.spiegel.de/lebenundlernen/schule/ehrgeizige-vietnamesen-streben-fuer-die-familienehre-a-733046.html
[7] Die besten deutschen Schüler stammen aus Vietnam 2011-02-06
https://www.welt.de/politik/deutschland/article12458240/Die-besten-deutschen-Schueler-stammen-aus-Vietnam.html
The allegation of discrimination will explain or even excuse the radicalization. If done this is always the claim to be the victim. However this allegation is difficult to uphold. Individual cases of discrimination may occur, but the current law prohibits such discrimination. On the other hand, a bizarre contest for tolerance occurs by providing separate swimming pools times or baning pork from canteens, and allowing questionable clubs such as DITIB or Milli Görüs. [1]
Grundgesetz für die Bundesrepublik Deutschland Art 3However declaring a radicalization by allegations of discrimination or even apologizing is always an admission of a lack of personal responsibility. And anyone who claims that discrimination or even insults lead to radicalization always claims that people are not act with personal responsibility. Why do Muslims take caricatures personally decades after the life of Brian by Monty Python or History of the World by Mel Brooks were commercial successes?
(3) Niemand darf wegen seines Geschlechtes, seiner Abstammung, seiner Rasse, seiner Sprache, seiner Heimat und Herkunft, seines Glaubens, seiner religiösen oder politischen Anschauungen benachteiligt oder bevorzugt werden. Niemand darf wegen seiner Behinderung benachteiligt werden.
Basic Law for the Federal Republic of Germany Art. 3
(3) No one shall be discriminated against or favored because of his or her sex, descent, race, language, homeland, origin, religion, religious or political views. Nobody may be disadvantaged because of his or her disability. [1]
Another accusation is that discrimination within empoyment or unemployment is causing radicalization. This accusation is particularly absurd in the current state of the European Union. According to this argument, large parts of the population in Spain, Italy and Greece would have become terrorists as a result of high unemployment and very high youth unemployment. But they are not. On the other hand, this does not explain the success of Vietnamese in Germany. As a result of the Vietnam War Germany has acceptet various people who came from a completely foreign culture and were also war refugees. Nevertheless Vietnamese are on average very successful in Germany. [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7]
A particularly perfidious excuse is that the affected people have learned only locally that the IS commits crimes or that the other members of the IS are not real Muslims. With regards to the news coverage it is absurd to believe that the affected people did not know that the IS commits crimes, did not realize it until the end of the war or have remorses only now. Claiming that IS are not real Muslims is just a distraction with a new definition. It is nothing more than a no true Scotsman fallacy to disguise any common ground and responsibility for the underlying ideology.
But a different treatment in Europe that pushes for a radicalization still takes place. What is supplied that grows. And if a misconduct such as joining a terrorist group at worst remains without sanctions, then only such behavior can be expected in the future.
[1] Grundgesetz für die Bundesrepublik Deutschland Art 3
https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/gg/art_3.html
[2] Integration - Das vietnamesische Wunder 2009-01-22
https://www.zeit.de/2009/05/B-Vietnamesen/komplettansicht
[3] Vietnamesen in Deutschland - Unauffällig an die Spitze 2010-01-22
http://www.taz.de/!5149000/
[4] Vietnamesen in Deutschland - "Ich wollte immer auf die Uni" 2010-04-01
https://www.sueddeutsche.de/politik/vietnamesen-in-deutschland-nur-bildung-fuehrt-weg-vom-reisfeld-1.20543-2
[5] Integration: Der Fleiß und sein Preis 2010-09-09
https://www.zeit.de/2010/37/Integration-Vietnamesen/komplettansicht
[6] Ehrgeizige Vietnamesen - Streben für die Familienehre 2010-12-06
http://www.spiegel.de/lebenundlernen/schule/ehrgeizige-vietnamesen-streben-fuer-die-familienehre-a-733046.html
[7] Die besten deutschen Schüler stammen aus Vietnam 2011-02-06
https://www.welt.de/politik/deutschland/article12458240/Die-besten-deutschen-Schueler-stammen-aus-Vietnam.html